✍ Dr. Dipak Giri is an Indian writer, editor and critic who lives in Cooch Behar, a district town within the jurisdiction of state West Bengal, India.

Pages


☛ To purchase hard copy of any of my published books, visit Amazon / Flipkart (if not available there, feel free to contact me at dipakgiri84@yahoo.in or whatsapp me at +919002119242 )
☛ Call for Paper for upcoming anthology "Dalit Autobiography: A Critical Study". Last Date for Submission Article: 30.11.2024. For Any Query, Please Contact at cfpforbookchapter@gmail.com

How does Samuel Johnson defend Shakespeare on the charge of violating the ‘three unities’?



How does Samuel Johnson defend Shakespeare on the charge of violating the ‘three unities’?

Answer: The neo-classical critics raised the question of unites concerning the free dramatic expression of the Elizabethans, particularly Shakespeare. Since the critics of the age showed allegiance to the rules of the classical writers and critics like Sophocles, Euripides, Aristotle and Horace, they put their late writers in the classical mould of (of standard) writing. Whoever fitted nice, passed for valid and if otherwise invalid. Shakespeare with all his natural capabilities was brought to the scale of judgment. Here Johnson in his “Preface to Shakespeare” comes to defend him and shows the inanity of observing the unites of place and time but action.

Among the unites, Johnson found only the unity of action justified by reason since it is needed to present the plot as an inseparable whole. But he founds the grounds for the unites of time and place to be wholly misleading.

He first echoes the objection raiser, “The necessity of observing the unites of time and place arises from the supposed necessity of making the drama credible. The unities hold it impossible, that an action of months and years can be possibly believed to pass in three hours.

............................................................................................................To Get Complete Note Contact Us