✍ Dr. Dipak Giri is an Indian writer, editor and critic who lives in Cooch Behar, a district town within the jurisdiction of state West Bengal, India.

Pages


☛ To purchase hard copy of any of my published books, visit Amazon / Flipkart (if not available there, feel free to contact me at dipakgiri84@yahoo.in or whatsapp me at +919002119242 )
☛ Call for Paper for upcoming anthology "Dalit Autobiography: A Critical Study". Last Date for Submission Article: 30.11.2024. For Any Query, Please Contact at cfpforbookchapter@gmail.com

Write a short essay on the closure of the theaters by the Puritans.



Write a short essay on the closure of the theaters by the Puritans.
THERE never was such a general passion for dramatic entertainments as during the Elizabethan period; the art was thoroughly studied and understood, as how could it be otherwise under the reign of such dramatists as Jonson, Beaumont and Fletcher, and Shakespeare? The actors lived in their fine old substantial city houses, or in grand country manors, such as Edward Alleyn inhabited at Dulwich, esteemed and sought after by the best people, and if commonly prudent, died rich and honored. Their worst enemy was the plague; while it raged, and that was pretty frequently, all theaters were closed, and they had to migrate into the country, which was not profitable.
But as Puritanism advanced, the prosperity of the theatrical profession began to decline. In 1622 there were but four principal companies--the King's, which acted at the Blackfriars and the Globe; the Prince's, at the Curtain; the Palgrave's, at the Fortune; the Queen of Bohemia's, at the Cockpit. 1629 was the first year in which a female performer was seen in the English theater. The innovation was introduced by a French company, but the women were hissed and pippin-pelted off the stage. This was at the new theater just opened in Salisbury Court. Three weeks afterwards they made a second attempt, but the audience would not tolerate them. King Charles and his Queen had a great love for dramatic entertainments; the latter frequently took part in the Court Masques, which brought down upon her the brutal language of that canting fellow Prynne. Yet in 1635 Sir Henry Herbert, the Master of the Revels, under whose jurisdiction all theatrical affairs were then placed, mentions only the King's company under Lowin and Taylor at Blackfriars, the Queens under Beeston at the Cockpit, the Prince's under Moore and Kane at the Fortune; in the next year he adds a fourth, doubtless Salisbury Court, to the list, which house was probably closed on the previous date.
On the 6th of September, 1642, the theaters were closed by ordinance, it being considered not seemly to indulge in any kind of diversions or amusements in such troublous times. In 1647 another and more imperative order was issued, in consequence of certain infractions of the previous one, threatening to imprison and punish as rogues all who broke its enactments. Close upon the heels of this second came a third, which declared all players to be rogues and vagabonds, and authorized the justices of the peace to demolish all stage galleries and seats; any actor discovered in the exercise of his vocation should for the first offense be whipped, for the second be treated as an incorrigible rogue, and every person found witnessing the performance of a stage play should be fined five shillings.

............................................................................................................To Get Complete Note Contact Us